Ockley

Has been described as a Questionable Timber Castle (Motte)

There are cropmark/slight earthwork remains

NameOckley
Alternative Names
Historic CountrySurrey
Modern AuthoritySurrey
1974 AuthoritySurrey
Civil ParishOckley

Pond Bay (alleged castle mound). Possibly a small castle of the De Clares, dismantled by Henry II. Identified by Aubrey in the 17th century as the moated mound of a castle. It is a pear-shaped enclosure, nearly 300 ft long, with the broader end to the east where there is an irregular-shaped mound with an extension thrown back at a right angle to face north. Outside this north-eastern angle is a platform with traces of an external ditch. The southern side is bounded by a stream in an artificially straightened ravine, and the eastern front may have been covered by an inundation. There are traces of a ditch on the northern side and in the angle where this joins the stream to the west are traces of a small mound. West of this angle are traces of an artificial bank, perhaps to make another inundation. (Surrey HER ref. VCH)

On the far side of the field north of Ockley Church, among some trees, is an earthwork. It was apparently a pear-shaped inclosure with the broader end to the east. The length is nearly 300 ft. At the eastern end is a broad mound with an extension thrown back at a right angle to face north. Outside this north-eastern angle is a ravelin or platform with traces of a ditch round it. The southern side is bounded by a stream in an artificially-straightened ravine. The eastern front may have been covered with an inundation. On the northern side only the traces of a ditch remain, but in the angle where this joins the stream, to the west, are traces of a small mound. West of this angle again are traces of an artificial bank, perhaps to make another inundation. Aubrey in the 17th century recognized the 'mole and mote' of a castle, and a small castle of the De Clares, built in Stephen's time and dismantled by Henry II, is not impossible. It is a likely spot, near a main road, which was then no doubt in use for its whole length

Aubrey has preserved a tradition, repeated and ridiculed by later writers, that there was a castle here destroyed by the Danes, who placed battering engines on Bury Hill. All who notice the story take Bury Hill to be Anstiebury Camp, 2 miles or more away. But where the road ascends from Ockley towards Dorking, just before the branch to Coldharbour goes off on the left, the hill was called Bury Hill. It is very much nearer, under half a mile away instead of over two, and although too far for a catapult to act, it is not an impossible camp for some force attacking a strong place near Ockley Church. Danes may be, of course, any enemy, described by that name from confusion of traditions. (VCH, 1911)

Possibly a small castle of the De Clares, built temp. Stephen and dismantled by Henry II - identified by Aubrey in the 17th C. as the moated mound of a castle. It is a pear-shaped enclosure, nearly 300 ft long, with the broader end to the east where there is an irregular-shaped mound with an extension thrown back at a right angle to face north. Outside this north-eastern angle is a platform with traces of an external ditch. The southern side is bounded by a stream in an artificially straightened ravine, and the eastern front may have been covered by an inundation (VCH). There are traces of a ditch on the northern side and in the angle where this joins the stream to the west Not scheduled

Not Listed

Historic England (PastScape) Defra or Monument number(s)
County Historic Environment Record
OS Map Grid ReferenceTQ158409
Latitude51.156078338623
Longitude-0.344370007514954
Eastings515880
Northings140950
HyperLink HyperLink HyperLink

No photos available. If you can provide pictures please contact Castlefacts

Most of the sites or buildings recorded in this web site are NOT open to the public and permission to visit a site must always be sought from the landowner or tenant.

Calculate Print

Books

  • Salter, Mike, 2001, The Castles of Surrey (Malvern: Folly Publications) p. 20
  • King, D.J.C., 1983, Castellarium Anglicanum (London: Kraus) Vol. 2 p. 466 (possible)
  • Malden, H.E. (ed), 1912, VCH Surrey Vol. 4 p. 398
  • Clinch and Montgomerie, 1911, Malden, H.E. (ed), VCH Surrey Vol. 3 p. 150-1 online transcription
  • Aubrey, J., 1718, Natural History and Antiquities of Surrey Vol. 4 p. 186 online copy